# Make.com Review 2026 — Pricing vs Zapier & Is It Worth It? By [Navneet Arya](https://ainexustools.online/about/) · Updated September 1, 2026 Make.com 2026: $9/month Core pricing, a 1,000-operation free tier, and a 4.6 G2 rating reviewed. See why it beats Zapier on power-to-price for branching workflows. ✓ Personally researched · Last verified: **August 2026** · [See our methodology](/methodology/) ✓ Independently researched · [See our review methodology](/methodology/) · Research-based review ## ⚡ Quick Answer: What is Make? Make bills by the operation rather than Zapier's per-task model, typically delivering a significantly higher usable allowance for a comparable fee. Free plan: 1,000 operations/month. Core plan runs roughly $9/month for 10,000 operations. Ships an official first-party MCP server. ## Our Research Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual, no-code automation platform that bills by the operation — each module run inside a scenario — rather than Zapier's per-task model, which typically delivers a significantly higher usable allowance for a comparable monthly fee. The Free plan includes 1,000 operations/month, and the Core plan runs roughly $9/month for 10,000 operations, with Pro/Teams tiers scaling from there and custom Enterprise pricing available. Make ships an official first-party MCP server, documented at developers.make.com, letting AI systems run existing scenarios and manage account contents via OAuth or an MCP token, plus pre-built AI-integrated modules for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google AI that drop into any scenario step for classification, summarization, or generation. G2 reviewers rate Make at 4.6/5 from 270 reviews as of August 2026, with a G2 head-to-head comparison against Relay.app specifically noting Make's affordability and wide integration range as standout strengths. Reviewers consistently describe getting a working scenario live within minutes of signing up, and the catalog of off-the-shelf integrations covers the large majority of mainstream business tools, with HTTP/webhook modules filling gaps for less common services. The most common critique is a smaller native integration library than Zapier's roughly 8,000+, and the absence of a dedicated AI reasoning/agent node — AI capability in Make stays limited to pre-built modules dropped into an otherwise human-designed execution path, unlike n8n's tool-using AI Agent node. Make is the consistent recommendation for teams that have outgrown Zapier's lower tiers but aren't ready to manage self-hosted infrastructure: same visual, no-code building experience as Zapier, at materially better unit economics — a five-step workflow running 2,000 times a month costs roughly $9/month on Make versus $69–$100+/month on Zapier. **Rating:** 4.6/5 · **Pricing:** Free (1,000 ops/mo) + ~$9–$16+/month (Core, Pro) ## Related Articles - [n8n vs Make vs Zapier: Full Comparison](https://ainexustools.online/blog/n8n-vs-make-vs-zapier-2026/) - [n8n Review](https://ainexustools.online/tools/n8n/) - [Zapier Review](https://ainexustools.online/tools/zapier/) - [Best No-Code AI Automation Tools 2026](https://ainexustools.online/blog/best-no-code-ai-automation-tools-2026/) [About](https://ainexustools.online/about/) [Contact](https://ainexustools.online/contact/) [Privacy Policy](https://ainexustools.online/privacy/) [Terms of Service](https://ainexustools.online/terms/) [Affiliate Disclosure](https://ainexustools.online/disclosure/)